Title | Evaluation of measurement comparisons using generalized least squares: The role of participants' estimates of systematic error |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2014 |
Authors | Clare, J.F., Koo A., and Davies R.B. |
Journal | Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods |
Volume | 43 |
Issue | 20 |
Pagination | 4297 - 4307 |
Date Published | 2014 |
ISSN | 03610926 (ISSN) |
Keywords | Comparison of measurements, Fixed effects, Generalized least square, Laboratory practices, Measurement comparison, Measurement errors, Measurement procedures, Measurements, Random effects, Random errors, Random processes, Systematic errors, Units of measurement, Variance estimate |
Abstract | We consider the evaluation of laboratory practice through the comparison of measurements made by participating metrology laboratories when the measurement procedures are considered to have both fixed effects (the residual error due to unrecognised sources of error) and random effects (drawn from a distribution of known variance after correction for all known systematic errors). We show that, when estimating the participant fixed effects, the random effects described can be ignored.We also derive the adjustment to the variance estimates of the participant fixed effects due to these random effects. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. |
URL | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84910675893&partnerID=40&md5=54b1c03ad1a4e001989141f702405faf |
DOI | 10.1080/03610926.2012.724510 |